Is the Healthy Built Environment Worth the Effort?

After reviewing Lesson 13, I more fully understand the differences and similarities of the eight standards mentioned. I have always thought LEED was important to consider when planning a project. Still, the new standards I've become familiar with this semester have opened my eyes to many new opportunities to incorporate healthy and highly beneficial standards in the future. 

The term "healthy buildings" refers to increasing awareness of structures that support people's physical, psychological, and social health. Healthy buildings incorporate a holistic combination of systems to positively impact overall human health and wellness, comfort, community, and the environment. 

Another factor to consider is how our world has evolved and, specifically, during the pandemic.

"Work/life balance" is crucial to most working adults, and the past 20 months have placed increased emphasis on one's mental health as well as physical health. I feel strongly that employers need to put a much higher value on providing for their employees' overall safety, health, and wellness. 

Designers can work with employers, housing authorities, municipalities, and just about anyone else interested in creating "space" for humans to improve the built environment. An excellent way to enhance evaluations of a space is by using multiple certification programs, such as LEED, Fitwel, or WELL.

I found a website that discusses the World Green Building Council & Wellbeing Framework. On this site, the authors stated neither a green building nor a healthy building certification could dig in on all crucial concepts, but instead, it takes an umbrella framework for thinking about both sides of the coin. The World Green Building Council model seems more logical to meet the needs of the masses more readily. I would suggest this model for designers and clients to pursue a holistic approach to the built environment.